PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-48.13%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-69.85%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-116.77%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-116.77%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-123.79%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-118.55%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-118.55%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
28.12%
Share count expansion well above VTLE's 0.34%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
27.89%
Diluted share count expanding well above VTLE's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
68.11%
Dividend growth of 68.11% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-5.37%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-198.57%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-83.53%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 5.80%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-60.40%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
13.09%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 80.00%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-82.25%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-65.97%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
132.32%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 25.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-115.65%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-228.12%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
55.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of VTLE's 97.31%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
-72.76%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
20.07%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
29.76%
Below 50% of VTLE's 2452.11%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-94.27%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-66.69%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
48.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 48.51% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
96.71%
AR growth well above VTLE's 13.99%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.32%
Asset growth above 1.5x VTLE's 3.90%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.58%
Positive BV/share change while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
41.28%
Debt growth far above VTLE's 10.43%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
122.44%
SG&A growth well above VTLE's 1.59%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.