PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.35%
Negative revenue growth while VTLE stands at 12.68%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-31.93%
Negative gross profit growth while VTLE is at 12.01%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-108.89%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-108.89%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-104.03%
Negative net income growth while VTLE stands at 8.66%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-104.13%
Negative EPS growth while VTLE is at 8.75%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-104.05%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VTLE is at 8.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.85%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.02%
Reduced diluted shares while VTLE is at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
6.13%
Dividend growth of 6.13% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-3.44%
Negative OCF growth while VTLE is at 2.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-17.89%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
179.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 38.52%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-60.37%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
25.85%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 21.57%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
-69.62%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
59.63%
Positive OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
142.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 0.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-100.55%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-101.73%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
98.59%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-65.42%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 10.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-41.48%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
7.14%
Below 50% of VTLE's 378.96%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-90.36%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-71.46%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
18.03%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 18.03% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-20.58%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 3.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.61%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.98%
Positive BV/share change while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.24%
Debt shrinking faster vs. VTLE's 20.24%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.62%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 50.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.