PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-72.53%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-106.81%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-634.78%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-634.78%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1141.09%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1141.36%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1141.36%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.17%
Dividend growth of 4.17% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-79.33%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
39.73%
FCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 5.44%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-71.94%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-43.36%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-49.79%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-92.56%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-74.58%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-59.80%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-392.82%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-76.29%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1091.85%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-80.13%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-51.35%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-35.15%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 18.84%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-90.34%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-56.24%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
33.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 33.76% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-9.41%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.90%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-42.37%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
4.38%
Debt growth far above VTLE's 0.03%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.71%
We expand SG&A while VTLE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.