PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
63.91%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 56.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
467.26%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VTLE's 12213.20%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
62.90%
EBIT growth below 50% of VTLE's 216.27%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
62.90%
Operating income growth under 50% of VTLE's 216.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
65.30%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 56.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
65.32%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 56.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
65.32%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 56.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.00%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
321.37%
OCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 64.68%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
205.19%
FCF growth 75-90% of VTLE's 234.71%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
-72.18%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 54.37%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-41.29%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 4.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
3.54%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-78.91%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 64.91%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-29.56%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
3.45%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-242.27%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
20.35%
Below 50% of VTLE's 74.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-487.55%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-85.78%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-58.07%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-53.19%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-90.75%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-59.12%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
28.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 28.42% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-6.53%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.75%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-25.90%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-2.85%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.70%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 7.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.