PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.73%
Revenue growth under 50% of VTLE's 28.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
14.09%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VTLE's 28.83%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
104.96%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VTLE's 57.78%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
104.96%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 57.78%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
64.88%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 203.14%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
64.56%
EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 182.90%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
64.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 181.76%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.91%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 24.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.35%
Dividend growth of 49.35% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
8.27%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
21.80%
Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-56.46%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 13.57%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
21.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 76.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
5.31%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-65.22%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
191.43%
Positive OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-31.84%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-134.36%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-115.16%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is 523.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-237.14%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE is 81.90%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-86.88%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-59.33%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-56.57%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-85.59%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
90.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 90.00% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
96.33%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 96.33% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
0.08%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. VTLE's 35.37%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.95%
Negative asset growth while VTLE invests at 26.43%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.60%
We have a declining book value while VTLE shows 216.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-9.01%
We’re deleveraging while VTLE stands at 2.98%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.01%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.