PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
86.64%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VTLE's 23.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
224.24%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VTLE's 36.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
23983.33%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VTLE's 42.41%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
23983.33%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 42.41%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
2022.22%
Net income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 58.06%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
1992.86%
EPS growth above 1.5x VTLE's 50.58%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
1992.86%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VTLE's 50.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.92%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 5.01%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.59%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-8.87%
Negative OCF growth while VTLE is at 114.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-28.64%
Negative FCF growth while VTLE is at 89.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-23.01%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 9.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
168.71%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 83.53%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
3.04%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 51.62%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-62.17%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
145.99%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 36.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-2.73%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 12.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
419.26%
Below 50% of VTLE's 4373.65%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
425.81%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 350.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
-1.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE is 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-82.36%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-45.21%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 104.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-49.93%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-86.10%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
70.10%
Dividend/share CAGR of 70.10% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
103.48%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 103.48% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-1.74%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 23.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.07%
Asset growth well under 50% of VTLE's 12.96%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
32.42%
Under 50% of VTLE's 118.37%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.22%
We’re deleveraging while VTLE stands at 5.26%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.79%
We expand SG&A while VTLE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.