PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.58%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-40.39%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-41.75%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-41.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-63.52%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-63.08%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-62.83%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.29%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.63%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
13.73%
Dividend growth of 13.73% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
22.06%
OCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 6.62%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-11.41%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
44.06%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
54.52%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
2.64%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 14.69%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
88.97%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
122.94%
Positive OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.66%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
167.57%
Below 50% of VTLE's 3030.10%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
156.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
23.02%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
0.40%
Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-7.34%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-17.62%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-75.18%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
223.44%
Dividend/share CAGR of 223.44% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
170.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 170.29% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-16.29%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
Asset growth well under 50% of VTLE's 7.96%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.01%
Under 50% of VTLE's 10.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
4.12%
Debt shrinking faster vs. VTLE's 14.20%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.80%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 113.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.