PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.33%
Negative revenue growth while VTLE stands at 0.77%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.14%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-21.68%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-31.01%
Negative net income growth while VTLE stands at 158.74%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-32.16%
Negative EPS growth while VTLE is at 135.93%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-31.98%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VTLE is at 136.57%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
2.09%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 9.74%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.25%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 9.31%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
32.49%
Dividend growth of 32.49% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-22.19%
Negative OCF growth while VTLE is at 114.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-58.30%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-25.11%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
93.79%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
261.15%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 96.05%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-11.46%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
32.40%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of VTLE's 37.24%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
639.87%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 159.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-72.83%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 190.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
268.40%
Below 50% of VTLE's 1607.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
107.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of VTLE's 134.97%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
3.60%
Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
8.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 7.06%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
65.24%
Below 50% of VTLE's 175.94%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-54.90%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
346.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 346.01% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
243.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 243.78% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-1.56%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.07%
Similar asset growth to VTLE's 29.63%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
15.60%
75-90% of VTLE's 19.25%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
51.54%
Debt growth far above VTLE's 34.23%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.06%
We expand SG&A while VTLE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.