PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.24%
Revenue growth under 50% of VTLE's 29.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-7.67%
Negative gross profit growth while VTLE is at 45.67%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-12.05%
Negative EBIT growth while VTLE is at 48.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-12.05%
Negative operating income growth while VTLE is at 48.34%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
20.83%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
9.63%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
9.70%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
9.74%
Share count expansion well above VTLE's 2.35%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
10.17%
Diluted share count expanding well above VTLE's 2.68%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-8.95%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
9.03%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-62.30%
Negative FCF growth while VTLE is at 112.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
2.67%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
46.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
111.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 58.89%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-47.72%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-28.55%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
74.44%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 32.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
16.51%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
626.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
125.34%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 101.30%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
-4.80%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
2.66%
Below 50% of VTLE's 9.13%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
108.34%
Below 50% of VTLE's 693.29%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-58.43%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
310.98%
Dividend/share CAGR of 310.98% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
226.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 226.06% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
21.27%
AR growth well above VTLE's 39.09%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.95%
Asset growth well under 50% of VTLE's 16.01%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-6.57%
We have a declining book value while VTLE shows 8.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.14%
We’re deleveraging while VTLE stands at 16.99%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.31%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 35.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.