PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.53%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VTLE's 2.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-16.61%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
80.51%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
80.51%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
110.84%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 5651.77%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
112.16%
EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 3618.52%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
111.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 5400.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.51%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 4.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.33%
Reduced diluted shares while VTLE is at 5.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-4.56%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
44.87%
OCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 9.11%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
852.90%
Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
7.54%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 5.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
-17.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 22.52%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
75.71%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 42.91%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
54.05%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
64.42%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 7.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
73.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 28.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
284.93%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 49.99% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-41.80%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is 11.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
232.64%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 202.55%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
9.25%
Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-2.49%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 40.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
157.13%
Below 50% of VTLE's 7953.40%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
8.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.84% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
321.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 321.64% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
210.30%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 210.30% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-11.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 19.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.44%
Asset growth well under 50% of VTLE's 17.77%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
9.12%
Under 50% of VTLE's 49.79%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-5.59%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.31%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 3.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.