PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.85%
Negative revenue growth while VTLE stands at 16.36%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.81%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-99.24%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-99.62%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-111.83%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-111.92%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-111.46%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.95%
Slight or no buybacks while VTLE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-1.40%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.94%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-0.20%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-3.31%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-45.62%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
37.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-35.73%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
118.92%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
37.14%
Positive OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
35.18%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-116.97%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-881.48%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is 53.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-104.25%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-40.25%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
2.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 1.20%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
99.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of VTLE's 136.80%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-12.61%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
206.22%
Dividend/share CAGR of 206.22% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
112.49%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 112.49% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-17.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 33.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.85%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.96%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.13%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
SG&A growth well above VTLE's 7.43%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.