PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.64%
Positive revenue growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.14%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VTLE's 206.49%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-2020.00%
Negative EBIT growth while VTLE is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4550.00%
Negative operating income growth while VTLE is at 96.16%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-165.00%
Negative net income growth while VTLE stands at 94.76%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-165.22%
Negative EPS growth while VTLE is at 90.08%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-177.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VTLE is at 90.08%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.59%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 2.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 2.32%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
1.61%
Dividend growth of 1.61% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-14.41%
Negative OCF growth while VTLE is at 36.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-45.30%
Negative FCF growth while VTLE is at 92222.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
10.77%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-10.27%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
19.45%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
5.42%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 182.37%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
53.88%
Positive OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
25.98%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
94.58%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-137.68%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
34.78%
Below 50% of VTLE's 90.31%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-38.35%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-1.32%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
112.72%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of VTLE's 182.44%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19.47%
Dividend/share CAGR of 19.47% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
224.25%
Dividend/share CAGR of 224.25% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
48.27%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 48.27% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.58%
Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.87%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.86%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
7.39%
We have some new debt while VTLE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.