40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.58%
Negative revenue growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -13.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-40.39%
Negative gross profit growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -19.33%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-41.75%
Negative EBIT growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -23.03%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-41.75%
Negative operating income growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -24.48%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-63.52%
Negative net income growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -13.20%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-63.08%
Negative EPS growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -8.81%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-62.83%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -8.81%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.29%
Share reduction while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.04%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.63%
Diluted share reduction while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
13.73%
Dividend growth of 13.73% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
22.06%
Positive OCF growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
-11.41%
Negative FCF growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is -30.66%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
44.06%
10Y CAGR of 44.06% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
54.52%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median of 18.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
2.64%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median of 48.20%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
88.97%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median of 36.39% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
122.94%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median of 54.91%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
100.66%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median of 57.94%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
167.57%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
156.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
23.02%
Below 50% of Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
0.40%
Equity/share CAGR of 0.40% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-7.34%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 3.20%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-17.62%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 28.11%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-75.18%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
223.44%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 223.44% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
170.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 170.29% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-16.29%
AR shrinking while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median of 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
4.01%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
4.12%
Slightly rising debt while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.80%
SG&A decline while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.