PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.48%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.32%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
27.46%
Gross profit growth of 27.46% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
41.97%
EBIT growth of 41.97% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
41.97%
Operating income growth of 41.97% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
115.34%
Net income growth of 115.34% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
33.82%
EPS growth of 33.82% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
37.88%
Diluted EPS growth of 37.88% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
58.62%
Share change of 58.62% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
56.84%
Diluted share change of 56.84% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-55.10%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
39.67%
OCF growth of 39.67% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
21.12%
FCF growth of 21.12% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-15.63%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-15.63%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-15.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-18.61%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-18.61%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-18.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
87.71%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.57% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
87.71%
Net income/share CAGR of 87.71% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
87.71%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 3.32%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
17.01%
Equity/share CAGR of 17.01% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
17.01%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 17.01% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
17.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 17.01% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
4.83%
Dividend/share CAGR of 4.83% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
4.83%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 4.83% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
4.83%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 4.83% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
9.76%
AR growth of 9.76% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
2.02%
Inventory growth of 2.02% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.56%
Asset growth of 2.56% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-34.29%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-4.80%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.67%
SG&A growth of 21.67% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.