PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.59%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
14.76%
Gross profit growth of 14.76% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
53.69%
EBIT growth of 53.69% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
53.69%
Operating income growth of 53.69% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-13.75%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-13.92%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-12.26%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-24.01%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-24.17%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
31.72%
Dividend growth of 31.72% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-45.29%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-407.69%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
54.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 28.80%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
54.38%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 12.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
54.38%
3Y CAGR of 54.38% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
75.24%
OCF/share CAGR of 75.24% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
75.24%
OCF/share CAGR of 75.24% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
75.24%
3Y OCF/share growth of 75.24% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-16.69%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 17.37%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-16.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 23.87%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-16.69%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
33.77%
Equity/share CAGR of 33.77% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
33.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 33.77% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
33.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 33.77% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
24.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 24.75% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
24.75%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 24.75% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
24.75%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 24.75% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
13.47%
AR growth of 13.47% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
99.73%
Inventory growth of 99.73% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
16.86%
Asset growth of 16.86% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
32.04%
BV/share growth of 32.04% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
49.83%
Debt growth of 49.83% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.47%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.