40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
87.35%
Revenue growth of 87.35% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
167.60%
Gross profit growth of 167.60% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
626.67%
EBIT growth of 626.67% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
626.67%
Operating income growth of 626.67% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
269.37%
Net income growth of 269.37% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
267.80%
EPS growth of 267.80% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
268.94%
Diluted EPS growth of 268.94% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.77%
Share change of 0.77% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.01%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-27.09%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
63.91%
OCF growth of 63.91% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
77.45%
FCF growth of 77.45% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
48.21%
10Y CAGR of 48.21% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-72.38%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
35.33%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-20.66%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-71.73%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-37.84%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
64.92%
Net income/share CAGR of 64.92% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-39.07%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
244.85%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 244.85% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
-17.51%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-74.01%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-68.30%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
305.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 305.40% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-63.33%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-26.38%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-13.44%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-19.51%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.54%
Asset growth of 0.54% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
12.03%
BV/share growth of 12.03% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-0.22%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.00%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.