Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 3.14%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.

Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 4.10%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.

Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 4.69%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.

Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 5.09%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.

Negative net income growth while Energy median is 2.38%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.

Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 3.91%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.

Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 3.85%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.

Share change of 0.30% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.

Diluted share growth above 2x Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.

Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.

10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Energy median of 11.70%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.

Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.

Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 13.34%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 4.39%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.

Net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Energy median. Guy Spier would see lagging competitiveness in core profitability.

Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.

Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 1.54%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.

Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.

Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.

Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.

AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.

Inventory growth of 107.58% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.

Debt growth of 0.50% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.

SG&A growth of 11.11% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.