PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.96%
Revenue growth of 32.96% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
39.42%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 7.01%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
855.56%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 17.15%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
855.56%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 17.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
146.22%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 18.35%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
147.06%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 14.94%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
147.06%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 14.94%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.37%
Share change of 0.37% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.37%
Diluted share change of 0.37% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
30.29%
Dividend growth of 30.29% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
104.11%
Positive OCF growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
269.41%
FCF growth of 269.41% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
8.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Energy median of 21.53%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-58.41%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 20.37%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
12.78%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 6.56%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
5.78%
OCF/share CAGR below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos would question if the firm is generating genuine operational cash flow over the long term.
-47.84%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
48.03%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 7.59%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
-34.62%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 31.57%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-87.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 33.54%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
47.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 3.21%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-24.78%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-77.31%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-69.25%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 2.04%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
81.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 81.20% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-82.78%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-65.53%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-19.48%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-24.60%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-2.58%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
1.32%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-10.24%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.91%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.