40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
43.89%
Revenue growth of 43.89% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
30.11%
Gross profit growth of 30.11% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
108.64%
EBIT growth of 108.64% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
108.64%
Operating income growth of 108.64% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
935.79%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.24%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
104.86%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.57%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
104.86%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.59%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.01%
Share growth above Energy median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.01%
Diluted share growth above 2x Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
1.99%
Dividend growth of 1.99% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-9.26%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 4.43%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-52.66%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
15.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Energy median of 13.62%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent reinvestment or product expansions drive this gap.
-40.32%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 18.67%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-3.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-17.95%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 25.20%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-73.84%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 27.43%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-48.28%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 5.90%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
790.84%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 17.27% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
11281.02%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 47.43%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
2224.02%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 2224.02% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
-1.96%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-61.43%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-43.08%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 4.06%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
41.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 41.88% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-82.77%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-65.53%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-0.08%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-100.00%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
13.95%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.04%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
37.06%
BV/share growth of 37.06% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.84%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.85%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.