40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-44.59%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is -17.40%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-54.72%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is -7.66%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-96.32%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-96.32%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-962.12%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-940.30%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-940.30%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
2.25%
Share change of 2.25% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
2.25%
Diluted share change of 2.25% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-25.67%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
84.67%
Positive OCF growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
57.38%
FCF growth of 57.38% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-51.03%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-65.61%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-32.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -12.64%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-64.35%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
160.94%
OCF/share CAGR of 160.94% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-24.10%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-5303.17%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -17.93%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-211.83%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -5.37%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-13921.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -22.17%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-0.16%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-47.77%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
9.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 9.13% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
23.02%
Dividend/share CAGR of 23.02% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-75.11%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-74.88%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-48.24%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
68.33%
Inventory growth of 68.33% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-7.25%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-3.90%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-3.85%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.