PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
58.07%
Positive revenue growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
163.75%
Positive gross profit growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
206.96%
Positive EBIT growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
206.96%
Positive operating income growth while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
23.23%
Positive net income growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
23.20%
EPS growth of 23.20% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
23.41%
Diluted EPS growth of 23.41% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.05%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.23%
Diluted share change of 0.23% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
2.75%
Dividend growth of 2.75% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
52.01%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
95.51%
FCF growth of 95.51% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-66.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-52.62%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
12.06%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a short-term advantage or a successful new product line.
-61.62%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-70.06%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-65.27%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-573.05%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -55.77%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-278.61%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -42.19%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
13.02%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
-50.44%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-66.09%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
6.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 6.58% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
-39.24%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-77.36%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-77.37%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-6.13%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-69.64%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-9.18%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-14.01%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is -1.76%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-1.51%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.04%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.