Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.

Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.

Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.

Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.

Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.

Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.

Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.

Share change of 0.51% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.

Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.

Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.

Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -18.73%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.

Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -34.78%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is -0.35%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -46.94%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.

Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -23.98%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.

Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -33.84%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.

Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -2.18%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.

Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.

Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.

Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.

AR growth of 3.27% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.

Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.

Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.

Debt growth of 3.77% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.