PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
168.96%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.34%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
2212.00%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.48%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
129.91%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
129.91%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
152.75%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 12.18%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
152.11%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.76%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
152.26%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.75%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
1.40%
Share growth above Energy median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.99%
Diluted share growth above 2x Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
16.55%
Dividend growth of 16.55% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
124.10%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
85.61%
FCF growth of 85.61% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-76.47%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is -0.65%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-64.31%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -30.63%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-39.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -36.53%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-89.40%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-88.07%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is -0.89%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-82.89%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is -26.81%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-78.00%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -36.56%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
126.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
45.04%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
-68.23%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-67.75%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-0.97%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -1.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-84.68%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-92.41%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-89.55%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
50.63%
AR growth of 50.63% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.34%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
25.25%
Positive BV/share change while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
-20.74%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.93%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.