PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.50%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 1.69%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-37.39%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 3.85%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-101.25%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 3.84%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-101.25%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 4.48%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-11.18%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-11.76%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-11.76%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.01%
Share growth above Energy median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.01%
Diluted share growth above 2x Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
-0.01%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
63.76%
OCF growth of 63.76% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
41.12%
FCF growth of 41.12% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-88.22%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-36.46%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -21.23%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-71.30%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -30.62%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-87.64%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-76.35%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-60.94%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is -24.84%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-75.90%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -18.28%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
117.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
-92.02%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -29.69%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-73.12%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-4.54%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-44.15%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -8.12%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-92.85%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-92.80%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-79.09%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-1.30%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.03%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.21%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
2.67%
BV/share growth of 2.67% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
0.48%
Debt growth of 0.48% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.91%
SG&A growth of 23.91% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.