PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.53%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.72%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
68.72%
Gross profit growth of 68.72% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
6650.00%
EBIT growth of 6650.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
6650.00%
Operating income growth of 6650.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-177.89%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-178.67%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-178.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.04%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.04%
Dividend growth of 0.04% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
3.36%
OCF growth of 3.36% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-20.69%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-83.97%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-42.93%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -5.63%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-59.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -8.92%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-86.82%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-61.04%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
7.72%
3Y OCF/share growth of 7.72% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-116.27%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-116.68%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-188.12%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 38.64%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-75.09%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-3.82%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-47.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -8.27%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-92.82%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-92.79%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-78.67%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-41.02%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.68%
Asset growth of 0.68% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-3.36%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
0.84%
Debt growth of 0.84% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.18%
SG&A growth of 10.18% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.