PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.51%
Revenue growth of 8.51% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
3.37%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Energy median of 6.27%. Guy Spier might worry about insufficient cost control or weaker pricing.
28.63%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 17.71%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
28.63%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 17.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
165.94%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.44%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
167.80%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 4.46%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
167.80%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-0.12%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
7.28%
Dividend growth of 7.28% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
3.25%
Positive OCF growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
9.29%
Positive FCF growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
-83.85%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-6.77%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -15.70%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-18.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-82.83%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-15.24%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-38.34%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
28.60%
Net income/share CAGR of 28.60% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
126.34%
Net income/share CAGR of 126.34% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
106.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 44.03%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-72.96%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
8.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 8.36% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-44.46%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -7.02%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-96.04%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-92.33%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-69.21%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
80.59%
AR growth of 80.59% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-100.00%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.03%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.84%
BV/share growth of 0.84% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-2.33%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.83%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.