PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
28.38%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
46.50%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 6.37%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
202.59%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 13.41%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
202.59%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 15.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
125.83%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 21.82%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
125.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 22.49%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
125.32%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 22.49%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
1.20%
Share growth above Energy median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-0.51%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.02%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.19%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
86.32%
OCF growth of 86.32% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
401.67%
FCF growth of 401.67% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-90.79%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-29.92%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -11.32%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-15.32%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-77.27%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-26.83%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
71.99%
3Y OCF/share growth of 71.99% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-99.14%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-83.96%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
102.78%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm expansions or margin boosts drive the short-term advantage.
-78.42%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-7.26%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-14.91%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -2.23%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-96.32%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-89.89%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-67.57%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-16.54%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.26%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-1.23%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.07%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.03%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.70%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.