PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
88.67%
Revenue growth of 88.67% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
189.76%
Gross profit growth of 189.76% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
1037.82%
EBIT growth of 1037.82% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
1037.82%
Operating income growth of 1037.82% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
2541.03%
Net income growth of 2541.03% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
2595.00%
EPS growth of 2595.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
2595.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 2595.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.18%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.98%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-36.84%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-41.99%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-71.76%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
29.57%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might identify a real advantage vs. struggling peers.
104.22%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.40%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-78.47%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-6.30%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
10.34%
3Y OCF/share growth near Energy median. Charlie Munger would find it typical for industry-level short-term expansions.
-24.74%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 46.37%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
417.78%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 15.34%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
248.83%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 82.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-74.49%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
12.04%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees an advantage over struggling peers in capital accumulation.
6.79%
Positive short-term equity/share CAGR while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch finds a relative advantage vs. sector-level slowdown.
-96.59%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-74.19%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-70.52%
Dividend reductions while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-35.11%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.17%
Asset growth of 0.17% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
14.88%
BV/share growth of 14.88% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-0.12%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.18%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.