PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
68.88%
Positive revenue growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
144.69%
Positive gross profit growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
2810.71%
Positive EBIT growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
2810.71%
Positive operating income growth while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
7116.67%
Positive net income growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
7112.99%
Positive EPS growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
7236.56%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
0.04%
Share change of 0.04% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-1.80%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-4.04%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-22.47%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is -19.73%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-243.59%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is -18.12%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-57.55%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
23.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might identify a real advantage vs. struggling peers.
52.64%
3Y CAGR of 52.64% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
141.75%
OCF/share CAGR of 141.75% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-31.50%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
299.96%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 1.34%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
-83.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -92.66%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
114.39%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
-26.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -97.97%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-67.37%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-37.53%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -11.58%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
16.99%
Positive short-term equity/share CAGR while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch finds a relative advantage vs. sector-level slowdown.
-90.83%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-63.16%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
19.85%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.85% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
4.80%
Slight AR growth while Energy cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.08%
We expand assets while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
2.59%
Positive BV/share change while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
-2.20%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2038.10%
Our SG&A slightly up while Energy is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.