PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.29%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 11.70%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
15.01%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Energy median of 27.05%. Guy Spier might worry about insufficient cost control or weaker pricing.
132.99%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 53.21%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
132.99%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 50.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
150.33%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 52.33%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
150.21%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 48.89%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
149.15%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 47.87%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.40%
Share change of 0.40% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
2.39%
Diluted share growth above 2x Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
-0.40%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
15.02%
OCF growth of 15.02% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
26.86%
FCF growth of 26.86% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-37.58%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is -4.92%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
58.08%
5Y CAGR of 58.08% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
4.57%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a short-term advantage or a successful new product line.
-26.03%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
241.13%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.14%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
62.15%
3Y OCF/share growth of 62.15% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
124.29%
Net income/share CAGR of 124.29% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
152.80%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 52.32%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
52.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 52.87% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
-86.16%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-51.37%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -6.47%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-54.42%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -10.01%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-90.76%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
19.56%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.56% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
19.52%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.52% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
40.60%
Receivables growth far exceeding Energy median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
7.31%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-6.78%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
318.18%
Our SG&A slightly up while Energy is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.