PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.94%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-33.60%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-162.05%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-162.05%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-166.34%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-166.39%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-168.10%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.23%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.84%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
4.41%
Dividend growth of 4.41% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-9.31%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-23.06%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-51.65%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
203.26%
5Y CAGR of 203.26% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
25.20%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a short-term advantage or a successful new product line.
-55.80%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
489.53%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 16.82%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
14.85%
3Y OCF/share growth of 14.85% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-166.10%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
77.75%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
1.25%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-86.86%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-47.70%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -8.88%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-55.96%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -8.15%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-90.35%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
48.27%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 48.27% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
29.89%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.89% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
8.12%
AR growth of 8.12% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.28%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-4.62%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-14.82%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.45%
SG&A growth of 8.45% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.