40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
89.93%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 9.00%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
309.76%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 6.74%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
971.26%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 6.17%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
971.26%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
663.07%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 4.47%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
661.70%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 2.40%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
654.26%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-0.08%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
1.24%
Diluted share change of 1.24% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
23.17%
Dividend growth of 23.17% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
96.20%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
255.98%
FCF growth of 255.98% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
192.62%
10Y CAGR of 192.62% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
161.01%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 18.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
95.23%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 8.82%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
21.95%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.36% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
366.46%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 52.81%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
59.30%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 18.43%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
152.43%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 93.18% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
210.19%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 100.02%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
333.70%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 76.41%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-51.25%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-35.07%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-37.58%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-75.07%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
245.88%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 245.88% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
174.91%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 174.91% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
6.23%
AR growth of 6.23% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.15%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai sees if expansions are strategic and well-supported by end demand.
24.37%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-15.45%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.15%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.