PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.58%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is -7.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-40.39%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is -3.95%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-41.75%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-41.75%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is -4.85%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-63.52%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is -0.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-63.08%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-62.83%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.29%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.63%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
13.73%
Dividend growth of 13.73% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
22.06%
Positive OCF growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
-11.41%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is -25.48%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
44.06%
10Y CAGR of 44.06% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
54.52%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 17.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
2.64%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Energy median of 37.58%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
88.97%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 15.07% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
122.94%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 46.06%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
100.66%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 31.17%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
167.57%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 79.14% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
156.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 92.23%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
23.02%
Below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
0.40%
Equity/share CAGR of 0.40% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-7.34%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 5.50%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-17.62%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 16.26%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-75.18%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
223.44%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 223.44% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
170.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 170.29% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-16.29%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
Asset growth of 0.45% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
4.01%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
4.12%
Slightly rising debt while Energy median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.80%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.