PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.65%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-22.33%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-27.12%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-27.12%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
0.59%
Net income growth of 0.59% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
2.40%
EPS growth of 2.40% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
2.42%
Diluted EPS growth of 2.42% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-1.30%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.54%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.12%
Dividend cuts while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
52.98%
OCF growth of 52.98% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
480.44%
FCF growth of 480.44% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-22.38%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
11.78%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
27.55%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 17.49%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-26.83%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 12.40%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
15.45%
5Y OCF/share growth 75-90% of Energy median. John Neff would encourage margin or efficiency gains to catch up.
31.03%
3Y OCF/share growth near Energy median. Charlie Munger would find it typical for industry-level short-term expansions.
-30.15%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 44.14%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
4.99%
Below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
261.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 73.89%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-15.54%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
7.00%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 3.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
155.92%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 21.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-12.18%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
227.32%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 227.32% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
207.52%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 207.52% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-2.00%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.13%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
1.97%
BV/share growth of 1.97% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.69%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.44%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.