PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.97%
Revenue growth of 4.97% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
92.74%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.82%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
9.56%
Positive EBIT growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
9.56%
Positive operating income growth while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
49.12%
Positive net income growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
50.78%
Positive EPS growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
51.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
-1.54%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.53%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.45%
Dividend growth of 0.45% while Energy median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
1.38%
OCF growth of 1.38% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
22.62%
FCF growth of 22.62% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-42.48%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
25.40%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 14.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
27.45%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 15.87%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-16.96%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
36.47%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 17.41%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
23.48%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Energy median of 15.61%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
-89.79%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 15.15%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
243.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 76.16%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
790.85%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 34.59%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-36.56%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
8.42%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 5.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
175.31%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 25.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-13.51%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
228.10%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 228.10% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
106.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 106.82% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
6.20%
Slight AR growth while Energy cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
257.99%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
4.78%
BV/share growth of 4.78% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-3.10%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.49%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.