40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
0.65
D/E less than half of CRK's 2.38. Charlie Munger would verify if this conservative approach provides competitive advantages.
10.73
Net debt while CRK maintains net cash position. John Neff would demand higher returns to justify the additional leverage risk.
1.29
Coverage of 1.29 while CRK has no interest expense. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
0.70
Similar current ratio to CRK's 0.73. Guy Spier would investigate if industry liquidity norms make sense for both companies.
16.90%
Similar intangibles to CRK's 16.70%. David Dodd would investigate if industry intangible norms reflect economic reality.