PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.15%
Revenue growth below 50% of BTE's 30.88%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
16.28%
Cost growth less than half of BTE's 35.73%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
9.37%
Gross profit growth below 50% of BTE's 29.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.25%
Other expenses change of 1.25% while BTE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
19.00%
Operating expenses growth while BTE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.29%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BTE's 7.84%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.85%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-38.64%
EBITDA decline while BTE shows 31.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.43%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x BTE's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.15%
Operating income growth below 50% of BTE's 54.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.02%
Operating margin decline while BTE shows 17.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
96.83%
Other expenses growth while BTE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-63.39%
Pre-tax income decline while BTE shows 143.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.36%
Pre-tax margin decline while BTE shows 86.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.53%
Tax expense reduction while BTE shows 92523.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-68.39%
Net income decline while BTE shows 103.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-71.81%
Net margin decline while BTE shows 55.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.71%
EPS decline while BTE shows 103.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-68.09%
Diluted EPS decline while BTE shows 92.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.94%
Share count reduction while BTE shows 0.71% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.81%
Diluted share reduction while BTE shows 6.50% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.