40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.78%
Revenue growth 50-75% of BTE's 25.72%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
14.97%
Cost growth above 1.5x BTE's 8.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
12.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of BTE's 49.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.17%
Margin decline while BTE shows 18.69% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.94%
Other expenses change of 8.94% while BTE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
13.17%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BTE's 1.89%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.47%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BTE's 6.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.11%
D&A growth above 1.5x BTE's 0.96%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
9.73%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BTE's 107.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-33.61%
EBITDA margin decline while BTE shows 64.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.10%
Operating income growth below 50% of BTE's 195.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.48%
Operating margin decline while BTE shows 135.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
92.83%
Other expenses growth while BTE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
379.91%
Pre-tax income growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
321.78%
Pre-tax margin growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
107.84%
Tax expense growth while BTE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
1213.67%
Net income growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1054.55%
Net margin growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1258.33%
EPS growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1258.33%
Diluted EPS growth while BTE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.45%
Share count reduction while BTE shows 3.77% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.76%
Diluted share reduction while BTE shows 4.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.