PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.94%
Revenue decline while BTE shows 14.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
14.92%
Cost growth above 1.5x BTE's 7.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-33.60%
Gross profit decline while BTE shows 34.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-27.87%
Margin decline while BTE shows 17.31% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.45%
G&A growth 50-75% of BTE's 14.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
14.90%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BTE's 32.04%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
14.91%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BTE's 8.37%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.79%
Interest expense growth while BTE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.96%
D&A growth less than half of BTE's 2.02%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-60.49%
EBITDA decline while BTE shows 148.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.34%
EBITDA margin decline while BTE shows 1.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-162.05%
Operating income decline while BTE shows 34.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-167.41%
Operating margin decline while BTE shows 16.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.48%
Other expenses reduction while BTE shows 890.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-254.14%
Pre-tax income decline while BTE shows 3817.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-267.44%
Pre-tax margin decline while BTE shows 3333.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
160.23%
Tax expense growth less than half of BTE's 928.69%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-166.34%
Net income decline while BTE shows 3078.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-172.07%
Net margin decline while BTE shows 2690.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-166.39%
EPS decline while BTE shows 3072.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-168.10%
Diluted EPS decline while BTE shows 3041.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while BTE shows 0.37% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.84%
Diluted share reduction while BTE shows 1.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.