40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.85%
Revenue decline while BTE shows 19.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.06%
Cost reduction while BTE shows 198.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.81%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.11%
Margin expansion while BTE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
Similar G&A growth to BTE's 16.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.91%
Other expenses change of 69.91% while BTE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
64.58%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BTE's 193.90%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
21.65%
Total costs growth less than half of BTE's 198.50%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.91%
Interest expense growth while BTE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.52%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-55.95%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-99.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-99.60%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-432.26%
Other expenses reduction while BTE shows 52.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-118.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-119.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-180.39%
Tax expense reduction while BTE shows 101.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-111.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-112.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.92%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.46%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.95%
Share count change of 0.95% while BTE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-1.40%
Diluted share reduction while BTE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.