40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.24%
Revenue decline while CNQ shows 1.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-23.67%
Cost reduction while CNQ shows 1.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
31.24%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x CNQ's 0.94%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
37.04%
Margin expansion while CNQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
710.60%
Other expenses growth while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
345.38%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CNQ's 27.31%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
29.07%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CNQ's 13.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.22%
D&A growth while CNQ reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.56%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
51.60%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of CNQ's 108.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-45.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-961.59%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-110.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-110.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.75%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-101.74%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.90%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.81%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.67%
Share count reduction while CNQ shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-5.89%
Diluted share reduction while CNQ shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.