40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.20%
Revenue growth below 50% of CNQ's 23.95%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-5.52%
Cost reduction while CNQ shows 666.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
38.86%
Positive growth while CNQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
24.88%
Margin expansion while CNQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.19%
Other expenses growth while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.94%
Operating expenses growth while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.32%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.52%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
38.11%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CNQ's 557.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
96.98%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of CNQ's 688.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
90.15%
Operating income growth below 50% of CNQ's 345.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
71.00%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CNQ's 298.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1749.84%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-61.27%
Pre-tax income decline while CNQ shows 838.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.17%
Pre-tax margin decline while CNQ shows 657.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1085.14%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CNQ's 132.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-91.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.71%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.13%
Share count change of 3.13% while CNQ is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
3.61%
Diluted share change of 3.61% while CNQ is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.