40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.16%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x CNQ's 2.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
17.38%
Similar cost growth to CNQ's 19.59%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-17.99%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.83%
G&A growth while CNQ reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.78%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.88%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
11.20%
Total costs growth while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.40%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.22%
Similar D&A growth to CNQ's 1.36%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-13.25%
EBITDA decline while CNQ shows 89.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.74%
EBITDA margin decline while CNQ shows 79.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.00%
Operating income decline while CNQ shows 118.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.35%
Operating margin decline while CNQ shows 113.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.70%
Other expenses reduction while CNQ shows 4.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-86.60%
Pre-tax income decline while CNQ shows 798.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.02%
Pre-tax margin decline while CNQ shows 775.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.05%
Tax expense reduction while CNQ shows 358.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-89.54%
Net income decline while CNQ shows 306.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-89.86%
Net margin decline while CNQ shows 295.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.63%
EPS decline while CNQ shows 300.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.63%
Diluted EPS decline while CNQ shows 300.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.03%
Share count reduction below 50% of CNQ's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.