40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
40.22%
Positive growth while CNQ shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.84%
Cost increase while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
145.91%
Positive growth while CNQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
75.38%
Margin expansion while CNQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.37%
G&A growth less than half of CNQ's 397.37%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.12%
Other expenses reduction while CNQ shows 2978.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.24%
Operating expenses reduction while CNQ shows 11.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.25%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x CNQ's 3.81%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-3.70%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.24%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
111.24%
EBITDA growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
285.95%
EBITDA margin growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
94.03%
Operating income growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
95.74%
Operating margin growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-612.07%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
42.50%
Pre-tax income growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.99%
Pre-tax margin growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.59%
Tax expense growth while CNQ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.06%
Net income growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.14%
Net margin growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.00%
EPS growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.00%
Diluted EPS growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.03%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.