40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
56.59%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CNQ's 2.04%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-12.93%
Cost reduction while CNQ shows 59.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
169.31%
Positive growth while CNQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
71.99%
Margin expansion while CNQ shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.82%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.33%
Other expenses growth while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.35%
Operating expenses growth while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.41%
Total costs reduction while CNQ shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.08%
Interest expense growth while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.55%
D&A reduction while CNQ shows 14.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
208.30%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x CNQ's 10.60%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
102.93%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x CNQ's 4.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
346.02%
Operating income growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
257.12%
Operating margin growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.72%
Other expenses growth while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
86.38%
Pre-tax income growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
91.30%
Pre-tax margin growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.06%
Tax expense growth while CNQ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
93.57%
Net income growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
95.89%
Net margin growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.61%
EPS change of 93.61% while CNQ is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
93.61%
Diluted EPS change of 93.61% while CNQ is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.03%
Share count increase while CNQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.