40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.96%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-13.14%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-36.13%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.85%
G&A reduction while CNQ shows 36.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
448.00%
Other expenses growth while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.04%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CNQ's 24.48%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.83%
Interest expense reduction while CNQ shows 26.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.43%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
58.42%
EBITDA growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
142.72%
EBITDA margin growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-206.50%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-245.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
131.19%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CNQ's 8.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
30.40%
Pre-tax income growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.53%
Tax expense growth while CNQ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
38.07%
Net income growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.21%
Net margin growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.02%
EPS growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.57%
Diluted EPS growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.10%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.81%
Diluted share increase while CNQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.