40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-41.09%
Revenue decline while CNQ shows 19.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
17.49%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x CNQ's 15.24%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
-74.47%
Gross profit decline while CNQ shows 25.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-56.66%
Margin decline while CNQ shows 5.38% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.73%
G&A growth less than half of CNQ's 125.69%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4216.67%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CNQ's 28.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
8.61%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CNQ's 112.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
14.29%
Total costs growth 50-75% of CNQ's 20.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-3.90%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.58%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-94.42%
EBITDA decline while CNQ shows 11.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-91.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-112.04%
Operating income decline while CNQ shows 12.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-120.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
26.98%
Other expenses growth less than half of CNQ's 117.74%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-117.80%
Pre-tax income decline while CNQ shows 19.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-130.22%
Pre-tax margin decline while CNQ shows 0.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-150.00%
Tax expense reduction while CNQ shows 11.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-117.41%
Net income decline while CNQ shows 22.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-129.56%
Net margin decline while CNQ shows 2.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-117.74%
EPS decline while CNQ shows 23.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-117.74%
Diluted EPS decline while CNQ shows 23.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.81%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.42%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.