40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.01%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-9.13%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.20%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.95%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CNQ's 0.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.78%
G&A growth less than half of CNQ's 73.08%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
352.54%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CNQ's 41.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
13.26%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CNQ's 56.36%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.98%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.79%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.24%
D&A growth 50-75% of CNQ's 8.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-7.28%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.18%
EBITDA margin decline while CNQ shows 2.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.43%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.32%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-10.41%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
35.38%
Tax expense growth while CNQ reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.98%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.13%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.83%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.69%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.