40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.65%
Revenue decline while CNQ shows 9.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.34%
Cost reduction while CNQ shows 5.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-22.33%
Gross profit decline while CNQ shows 22.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.09%
Margin decline while CNQ shows 11.96% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.51%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
341.67%
Marketing expense change of 341.67% while CNQ maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-7.23%
Other expenses reduction while CNQ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.05%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.12%
Total costs reduction while CNQ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.14%
Interest expense growth less than half of CNQ's 14.49%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.28%
D&A growth less than half of CNQ's 7.12%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
5.29%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CNQ's 30.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.07%
EBITDA margin decline while CNQ shows 15.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.12%
Operating income decline while CNQ shows 46.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.51%
Operating margin decline while CNQ shows 33.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-36.36%
Other expenses reduction while CNQ shows 11.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.88%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CNQ's 60.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.24%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of CNQ's 45.94%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
40.00%
Tax expense growth 1.25-1.5x CNQ's 28.50%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize strategy.
0.59%
Net income growth below 50% of CNQ's 73.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.86%
Net margin growth below 50% of CNQ's 58.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.40%
EPS growth below 50% of CNQ's 73.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.42%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CNQ's 73.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.30%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.54%
Diluted share reduction while CNQ shows 0.34% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.