40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.64%
Revenue growth 50-75% of CNQ's 14.90%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
3.30%
Cost growth less than half of CNQ's 11.58%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
13.14%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of CNQ's 24.41%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
4.15%
Margin expansion 50-75% of CNQ's 8.28%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
G&A reduction while CNQ shows 40.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.52%
Other expenses growth while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.84%
Operating expenses change of 20.84% while CNQ maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
12.81%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x CNQ's 11.21%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-8.49%
Interest expense reduction while CNQ shows 15.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.68%
Similar D&A growth to CNQ's 1.69%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-36.58%
EBITDA decline while CNQ shows 17.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.62%
EBITDA margin decline while CNQ shows 2.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4550.00%
Operating income decline while CNQ shows 26.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4196.17%
Operating margin decline while CNQ shows 10.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.97%
Other expenses reduction while CNQ shows 80.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-91.09%
Pre-tax income decline while CNQ shows 95.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.90%
Pre-tax margin decline while CNQ shows 69.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.07%
Tax expense growth less than half of CNQ's 42.63%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-165.00%
Net income decline while CNQ shows 115.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-143.93%
Net margin decline while CNQ shows 87.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.22%
EPS decline while CNQ shows 116.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-177.27%
Diluted EPS decline while CNQ shows 116.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.59%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.04%
Diluted share increase while CNQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
